lexutor

How to Beat a DUI Charge

If you find yourself arrested and charged with a DUI, you may wonder if there is anyway to get out of it. It can happen, but there are a few things you should know. Driving under the influence can carry some rather significant penalties, including jail time, steep fines, and losing your driving privileges. If you’re trying to avoid these penalties, then keep reading.

Discredit the Evidence

This is the fastest way to get a case thrown out of court. Police officers do make mistakes and a good attorney can capitalize on these mistakes. It may be something as minor as not waiting long enough before giving you a breath test or you having something in your mouth during the test. It could also be something as major as a police office that didn’t have probable cause to stop you. Discrediting the evidence against you in a DUI case is the fastest way to get your case dismissed.

Get a Good Attorney

Now is not the time to try to defend yourself in court. Shell out the cash for a great attorney. Don’t skimp by hiring a cheap one that just got out of law school. An experienced DUI attorney will know how to discredit the evidence, look for flaws in the prosecutor’s case against you, and will be familiar with the local courts, staff, and judges. They also will know how to help you keep your driver’s license. There’s only a short amount of time in which to file the paperwork with the state’s license bureau and if you miss this filing date, you’re not going to be driving for awhile.

Don’t Miss Court

If you miss a court date, you’re going to be in a lot of trouble. Not only will the original case still be there, you’re going to face additional fines and penalties for failing to appear. If you’re trying to beat a DUI, missing court is one of the fastest to ways to ensure it never happens.

Dress Appropriately

While you may feel like your appearance shouldn’t matter much, but it does. Showing up in your favorite pair of cutoff shorts and an old t-shirt can be taken a sign of disrespect. In fact, some courtrooms are very strict on what is allowed in the courtroom. If you have questions about what you should wear, then ask your attorney.

In Closing

The above information can help you beat a DUI, but it’s not a guarantee. Unfortunately, everything is in the hands of the judge. The best advice is to get a great attorney and let them work their magic.…

Terrorism Law Held Constitutional

Founded in 1974, the Partiya Karkeran Kurdistan (PKK) was established as a Marxist-Leninist insurgent group composed of Turkish Kurds who formed to seek Kurdish independence from Turkey. By the late 1990s the group had had morphed from a rural-based insurgent group into a full-fledged terrorist organization, sometimes using suicide bombings on civilian targets.

Founded in 1976, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) became one of the most lethal and well organized terrorist groups in the world that, beginning in 1983, waged an armed campaign in Sri Lanka to establish a separate Tamil homeland before the group was defeated by the Sri Lanka army in May 2009. The LTTE pioneered the use of suicide belts.

Both groups are designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations by the U.S Department of State.

The evidence is clear that the PKK and LTTE have engaged in terrorist activities, including suicide bombings, which have harmed innocent civilians. It was these kinds of international terrorist acts and the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that prompted the U.S. Congress to enact the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) which was signed into law by former President Bill Clinton in April 1996.

One of the controversial components of AEDPA was codified at 18 U.S.C. 2339B which makes it a federal crime to provide “material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations.” While Congress has amended the definition of “material support or resources” a number of times since 1996, Subsection 2339A (b) (1) offers the current definition:

“[T]he term ‘material support or resources’ means any property, tangible or intangible, or service, including currency or monetary instruments or financial securities, financial services, lodging, training, expert advice or assistance, safe houses, false documentation or identification, communications equipment, facilities, weapons, lethal substances, explosives, personnel (1 or more individuals who may be or include oneself), and transportation, except medicine or religious materials.”

Another component of AEDPA, the authority to designate an entity as a “foreign terrorist organization,” was codified at 8 U.S.C. 1189(a) (1), (d) (4). This authority rests with the Secretary of State who, after consultation with the Secretary of Treasury and Attorney General, must determine whether the organization is foreign, engages in “terrorist activity” or “terrorism,” and “threatens the security of United States nationals or the national security of the United States.”

In 1997 former Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright designated 30 groups as foreign terrorist organizations. Two of the groups on that list were PKK and LTTE.

The Humanitarian Law Project, which was founded in 1985 and is “dedicated to protecting human rights and promoting the peaceful resolution of conflict by using established international human rights law and humanitarian law,” filed a lawsuit in 1998 challenging the “material support or resources” provisions of A� 2339B. The lawsuit’s long convoluted history found its way to the U.S. Supreme Court and, on June 21, 2010, that court in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project upheld the constitutionality of the terrorism statute.

The Humanitarian Law Project (HLP) filed its lawsuit because, according to the group, A� 2339B prevented it from providing support for the humanitarian and political activities of PKK. This included: (1) “training members of PKK on how to use humanitarian and international law to peacefully resolve disputes”; (2) “engage in political advocacy on behalf of Kurds who live in Turkey”; and (3) “teach PKK members how to petition various representative bodies such as the United Nations for relief.” HLP also charged that A� 2339B prevented it from providing monetary contributions, legal training, and political advocacy for the LTTE. This included: (1) “train members of LTTE to present claims for tsunami-related aid to mediators and international bodies”; (2) “offer their legal expertise in negotiating peace agreements between LTTE and the Sri Lankan government;” and (3) “engage in political advocacy on behalf of Tamils who live in Sri Lanka.”

The HLP based its lawsuit on three constitutional challenges to 2339B: 1) it violated their First Amendment freedom of speech; and 2) it violated their First Amendment freedom of association. These two challenges were premised on the theory that 2339B criminalized their support to PKK and LTTE without the Government having to prove that HLP had a specific intent to further the unlawful ends of those groups. Finally, HLP challenged 2339B as being unconstitutionally vague.

A central issue in the case initially focused on exactly what constituted “personnel” and training.” While the lawsuit was pending, and in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks on the Twin Towers in New York, Congress enacted the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (Patriot Act) which amended the “material support or resources” provision of 2339B to include the term “expert advice or assistance.” The HLP filed a second lawsuit, which was ultimately …

Good To Know About The Different Types Of Lawyers

Taking the help of reputed lawyers to deal with lawsuits is a common experience which most US citizens residing in major cities like Kent (WA) and Edgewood (WA) have faced. In such cases it is important to understand the different legal processes, legal jurisdiction, and types of lawyers which in turn would help you get the best legal help available.

Legal cases can at times be serious, so it is very important to get the right lawyer who can help you immensely and is also the key to obtain wonderful results from lawsuits. Lawyers are of different types, some who are general practitioners dealing in non-specialized and routine cases, whereas, others may be specialists in a definite line of law. Usually the latter have a thorough knowledge of the finer details of the law that they deal in. The fees for these specialists are usually higher than the general attorneys; however, their expertise most often helps to enhance their effectiveness and efficiency.

Here is a list of some of the major types of lawyers and the type of law they deal in:

1.Accident and personal injury lawyers: These lawyers, also known as personal injury attorneys are the best people to help you in getting financial compensations and also relieve you from any legal complications pertaining to personal injury charges. Claims often relate to motor accidents, work related injuries, violations of rights, and medical errors. Sometimes personal injury charges may also be due to damage to the reputation of a person.

2.Criminal defense: These attorneys represent their clients who are charged with such charges in a criminal court of law. Generally these criminal defense lawyers try to prove that their clients are not guilty, whereas on the other hand, the prosecutor tries to prove otherwise. US citizens residing in most major cities like Tacoma (WA) and Kent (WA), who have been through such similar charges, would say that in criminal cases it is always a good idea to hire an experienced criminal defense attorney.

If you are looking for good lawyers – Kent (WA) and Newcastle (WA) are some of the cities in US where residents can hire the services of experienced lawyers from The Terry Law Firm. They offer knowledge and experience to their clients which help to resolve the latter’s cases with the best possible result. In case you need further information about the firm then visit .…